Essentials Of The Faith / Adult Sunday School Class
Psalm 127, An Allegory
II. Structure
The Psalm is divided into two parts; verses 1-2 and verses 3-5. They seem
to be two different themes but must somehow be connected.
III. Literal Interpretation
Question: What does verse 1 say to you?
Verse 1
This psalm was written in connection with Solomon's building the Temple in
Jerusalem. In verse 1 we see David reminding his son, Solomon, to keep his
priorities straight as to who will be the inspiration behind building the
house ( Hebrew:bayit) of God (other uses of the word bayit include temple).
David reminds him that no matter how skilled the laborer or how diligently he works his craft, unless the Lord is the reason and the guiding force behind it, it would be better if he didn't build it, for it will not please God.
Question: What does verse 2 say to you?
Verse 2
In verse 2 we see David giving a parallel example of how Solomon is to
trust in and rely upon God for the protection and care of all that was given
to him by God. We don't have to worry all day about what God has given to
us. We can sleep, rest assured that God is sovereign and He is in control
and will watch over us and the building of the Temple as we sleep. Again,
David is emphasizing Solomon's dependence on the Lord and on Him alone.
Question: What do verses 3-5 say to you?
Verses 3-5
In the second part of the Psalm , verses 3-5, we see an abrupt shift to a more personal (family) type of advice. Here David is telling Solomon of the importance of God being at the center of his family relationships, especially those concerning his children.
Question: How many wives did Solomon have?
Solomon had many wives and this was in direct rebellion to the commands of God. In his day, children, especially sons, were considered a blessing from God to the parent. At the time of this Psalm Solomon had only one son, with all his wives it must have seen like God was ignoring his requests for sons.
However, Solomon was trying to have sons of his own might by having multiple wives. He was not trusting in God to provide them for him. David was reminding him of this. Since it was considered a blessing from God to have many sons, then if you didn't, maybe you and God were not in good relationship. Others , especially your enemies, would see this and would have something evil to say about you and your relationship to your God.
Question: What is David's main or big idea that he wants his son Solomon to remember?
The main idea that David is trying to get across to his son, Solomon, is fear the Lord, trust in Him and do nothing in your own power. He is telling him that he can do nothing of value if the Lord is not in it.
Question: But what about us? Are we building a literal temple for God?
What about if we don't have any children, is this saying that we are not blessed by God?
Do I have to have a very large family for God's blessing to be evident
and for my retirement years to be cared for by my
children?
Does this mean that people will have bad things to say about us if we don't have a full quiver of children?
What about the abruptness between verses 1,2 and 3-5? What is the connection?
Like pealing back the layers of an onion and getting to the part that really hits you in the eyes, perhaps there is a deeper meaning than the literal words would suggest? This hidden, or deeper spiritual meaning or application is called Allegory.
IV. Allegorical Interpretation
Disclaimer: Allegory assumes that the human language is insufficient
to convey the profound mysteries of spiritual reality and the nature of God.
Some of the early church fathers used the allegorical method of
interpretation; Origen, Augustine, Bernard of Clairvaux, to name a few.
Luther and Calvin, along with many other reformers rejected the allegorical method of interpretation because it is subjective (seldom did two allegorical interpretations agree) and they insisted that Scripture had only one meaning.
I agree that allegory is not the best form of biblical interpretation,
but is also not to be wholly discounted.
-Take for example parable of the prodigal son. It is hard to make sense of
this story without assuming that the father in some way represents God ( or
Christ) and the prodigal represents the wayward and rebellious sinner (like
the tax collectors of Lk 15:1). The older brother represents the self
righteous hypocrite (like the Pharisees and Scribes of Lk 15:2) That's
allegory. (Also see Gal. 4:21ff)
Question: If the reformers were correct and all Scritpure has only one intended meaning , what is the main idea or single interpretation of the parable of the prodigal son?
1. The possibility of repentance for even the most rebellious sinner.
2. The lavish forgiveness God offers all His children
3. A warning against imitating the hard-heartedness of the older brother.
The literal theme of Psalm 127 seems to be 'God must be in all your actions if He is to bless it.' Let's see if there is something else the author wants us to understand about God and His ways.
Certainly, we in the 21st century are not building a physical building or Temple for God, like Solomon was and we don't have multiple wives to increase the odds of giving us sons as Solomon did, as a legacy. So what is this really saying to us today? Let's examine the Psalm.
-The word "house" can represent the spiritual kingdom of God which is inhabited by those who have been chosen by God and who have accepted His death on the Cross as payment for their sin. We can call these individuals regenerated man, believers or Christians.
-We see in John 14:1-3 that the kingdom of God is represented by a house to which Jesus said he goes to prepare a room for us.
-"labor in vain" can be seen as witnessing and soul winning for the sake of the person doing the witnessing.
-If we proclaim the mysteries of God unto salvation yet do it for our own glory, it will be without reward.
The following two phrases run parallel to the first two phrases. David is trying to make a point. The point being God is sovereign and all that is done by the believer must be done in accordance to His will and for His glory.
-The "city" seen here is the harvest field of unbelievers.
-Jesus will choose those who will be saved and His Spirit will surround them with irresistible grace to believe. It is the Holy Spirit who will direct our witnessing energy.
-In this phrase we see that as believers, "watchman", if we try to win souls on our own strength and without the guiding of the Holy Spirit, we do so without reward, for naught, for God is not with us and has not prepared the way for us.
Question: Doing what?
-What is it that we are fully experiencing? 'Bread'. This may represent sustenance or that which keeps us going. That which we make with our hands.
-Or 'bread' could mean the Word of God as given to us through the Scriptures.
-However the word "bread" is associated here with 'painful labor'. Therefore it can not mean the Word of God because man is not responsible for 'making' Scripture. (2 Peter 1:20-21) It was by divine revelation through which man wrote the Bible.
-'Painful labors" can be all the attempts man makes to bring glory to himself. It is the result of man's fall from the paradise of the garden. When we do things on our own and without the direction of God, we do them painfully, w/o joy and with much labor.
-When we sleep, we can do no work for ourselves. We stop trying to bring glory to ourselves when we sleep.
-'Sleep' here is symbolic for the times the believer gives up the reigns of his life an allows God to work through him.
Paul uses the term children to emphasize this point.
Romans 8:16 1The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children.
1 Corinthians 4:14 I am not writing this to shame you, but to warn you, as my dear children.
and even more fully revealed in
Galatians 4:19 My dear children, for whom I am again in the pains of childbirth until Christ is formed in you.
Is this speaking of literal children? No, Spiritual children wither those Paul led to the Lord or those who he has helped mature in Christ.
The term 'womb' can be related to what Christ speaks of when He encountered by Nicodemus.
John 3:3-4 In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again." "How can a man be born when he is old?" Nicodemus asked. "Surely he cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb to be born!"
Therefore, as we can see, the children spoken here are not our physical progeny but the progeny of the Holy Spirit in the regeneration of man. The 'gift' and the 'reward' are the same. It is the new believer him/herself. God can reward our faithfulness with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the lives of those who confess Him as savior.
-Remember how it felt when you got saved? Remember how it felt the first time you led someone to Christ? It felt exciting! Like being young again. Spiritual children given to the believer by God to build up His kingdom, is exciting.
-The idea of warfare continues as we see that God blesses the believer who has been faithful and who has proclaimed the Good News of Jesus to the unsaved.
-God has blessed his endeavors (with many new converts) because he did it to build God's kingdom and not to bring glory to himself.
-Therefore when pressured by Satan (the enemy) as to what we have done for God, we can say that we have served our God faithfully and the fruit or proof of this is in lives being won for Christ.
Conclusion:
Let's bring this all home.
Spiritual children live in God's house that God builds through faithful men and women. That's the connection between vs 1,2 and 3-5.
The house is God's Kingdom and he children are spiritual offspring of
the work of the Holy Spirit in faithful believers who share the Gospel of
Jesus Christ with those God surrounds with His irresistible grace.